|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha : |
27/08/2018 |
Actualizado : |
25/02/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
MIRABALLES, C.; RIET-CORREA, F. |
Afiliación : |
MÓNICA MIRABALLES FERRER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FRANKLIN RIET-CORREA AMARAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
A review of the history of research and control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Experimental and Applied Acarology, 2018, v. 75, no. 4, p. 383-398. |
DOI : |
10.1007/s10493-018-0278-3 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 13 May 2018 / Accepted: 30 July 2018. |
Contenido : |
Abstract: In Uruguay, control of Rhipicephalus microplus began in 1910. In 1941 the eradication of R. micoplus throughout the country was declared mandatory, although this attempt was unsuccessful. Since 2008 the country was divided into two regions: the south-western region, which is free of ticks; and a region of tick control that includes all departments to the north of the Rio Negro and five departments in the eastern region. In Uruguay, investigations on R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis started in 1921, and in the 1970s, studies of the epidemiology of R. microplus determined that from 2 to 3.5 generations can be produced annually and that the country is in an area of enzootic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Knowledge of tick epidemiology and of tick resistance to different acaricides led to the development of efficient methods of control or eradication, including integrated control and generational treatment. Although research results have led to a legal framework regarding R. microplus control, these measures have had variable results. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the discontinuation of the control measures,
variable financial resources, changes in the dynamics of livestock movement, failure to adopt available technology for tick control by farmers, climate change, environmental alterations such as forestation and the increasing resistance of ticks to acaricides, which led to the development of multiresistant ticks. This paper reviews the history of R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay and proposes alternatives for their control. MenosAbstract: In Uruguay, control of Rhipicephalus microplus began in 1910. In 1941 the eradication of R. micoplus throughout the country was declared mandatory, although this attempt was unsuccessful. Since 2008 the country was divided into two regions: the south-western region, which is free of ticks; and a region of tick control that includes all departments to the north of the Rio Negro and five departments in the eastern region. In Uruguay, investigations on R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis started in 1921, and in the 1970s, studies of the epidemiology of R. microplus determined that from 2 to 3.5 generations can be produced annually and that the country is in an area of enzootic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Knowledge of tick epidemiology and of tick resistance to different acaricides led to the development of efficient methods of control or eradication, including integrated control and generational treatment. Although research results have led to a legal framework regarding R. microplus control, these measures have had variable results. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the discontinuation of the control measures,
variable financial resources, changes in the dynamics of livestock movement, failure to adopt available technology for tick control by farmers, climate change, environmental alterations such as forestation and the increasing resistance of ticks to acaricides, which led to the development of multiresistant ticks. This pape... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
ANAPLAMOSIS; BABESIOSIS; CATTLE TICK; CONTROL. |
Thesagro : |
URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
L73 Enfermedades de los animales |
Marc : |
LEADER 02354naa a2200217 a 4500 001 1058946 005 2019-02-25 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1007/s10493-018-0278-3$2DOI 100 1 $aMIRABALLES, C. 245 $aA review of the history of research and control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2018 500 $aArticle history: Received: 13 May 2018 / Accepted: 30 July 2018. 520 $aAbstract: In Uruguay, control of Rhipicephalus microplus began in 1910. In 1941 the eradication of R. micoplus throughout the country was declared mandatory, although this attempt was unsuccessful. Since 2008 the country was divided into two regions: the south-western region, which is free of ticks; and a region of tick control that includes all departments to the north of the Rio Negro and five departments in the eastern region. In Uruguay, investigations on R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis started in 1921, and in the 1970s, studies of the epidemiology of R. microplus determined that from 2 to 3.5 generations can be produced annually and that the country is in an area of enzootic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Knowledge of tick epidemiology and of tick resistance to different acaricides led to the development of efficient methods of control or eradication, including integrated control and generational treatment. Although research results have led to a legal framework regarding R. microplus control, these measures have had variable results. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the discontinuation of the control measures, variable financial resources, changes in the dynamics of livestock movement, failure to adopt available technology for tick control by farmers, climate change, environmental alterations such as forestation and the increasing resistance of ticks to acaricides, which led to the development of multiresistant ticks. This paper reviews the history of R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay and proposes alternatives for their control. 650 $aURUGUAY 653 $aANAPLAMOSIS 653 $aBABESIOSIS 653 $aCATTLE TICK 653 $aCONTROL 700 1 $aRIET-CORREA, F. 773 $tExperimental and Applied Acarology, 2018$gv. 75, no. 4, p. 383-398.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registros recuperados : 233 | |
5. | | RIET-CORREA, F.; MIRABALLES, C. Cinco años de la Plataforma de Salud Animal. Producción Animal. Revista INIA Uruguay, 2020, no. 61, p. 32-36. (Revista INIA; 61). Los resultados de las actividades de la PSA son descriptos, en detalle, en los cinco informes anuales elaborados durante el período y elevados oportunamente al Comité Gerencial y la Junta Directiva.Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
16. | | CAFFARENA, D.; RIET-CORREA, F.; GIANNITTI, F. Uso de protocolos de manejo del dolor durante el desbotonamiento y descorne de las terneras de tambo: ¿Qué tan común es en Uruguay y Argentina?. In: Jornadas Uruguayas de Buiatría, 45., 2017, Paysandú, Uy., Matto, C.; Delpiazzo, R.(Ed.). Trabajos presentados. Paysandú: Centro Médico Veterinario de Paysandú/Sociedad Uruguaya de Buiatría, 2017. p.212-214.Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
18. | | DONCEL, B.; GIANNITTI, F.; LEMAIRE, C.; RIET-CORREA, F. Descriptive study of cow culling in dairy herds in Uruguay. (AH-P36). [poster-Animal Health] In: World Buiatrics Congress (WBC), 31 st., Abstract Book, Madrid, Spain, September 4-8, 2022. pp.30-31.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
19. | | GARCÍA PINTOS, C.; RIET-CORREA, F.; MENCHACA, A. Effect of foot-and-mouth disease vaccine on pregnancy failure in beef cows. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, November 2021, volume 8, Article number 761304. Open Access. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.761304 Article history: Received 19 August 2021; Accepted 18 October 2021; Published 12 November 2021.
Corresponding author: Menchaca, A.; Instituto de Reproducción Animal Uruguay, Fundación IRAUy, Montevideo, Uruguay;...Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
20. | | CAFFARENA, D.; SCHILD, C.; RIET-CORREA, F.; GIANNITTI, F. Estenosis yeyunal congenita en una ternera holstein con sindrome del ternero débil. In: JORNADAS URUGUAYAS DE BUIATRÍA, 43., 2015, PAYSANDÚ, UY.; GIANNEECHINI, E.; MATTO, C. (Ed.). [Trabajos presentados]. Paysandú: Centro Médico Veterinario de Paysandú/Sociedad Uruguaya de Buiatría. p. 224-226.Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 233 | |
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|